First and Last Word on Metals and Mining

“…Whilst the Feasibility Study on the Hosco deposit generates a positive return at three-year trailing average gold prices, we believe that it is prudent, in terms of capital allocation, to defer development and permitting of the Hosco deposit and continue to pursue exploration of these areas, which if successful, could lead to a staged and perhaps more financially beneficial development strategy at Joanna.”

“The opportunity at Heva lies in the fact that our early drilling is indicating higher grade ore potential than at Hosco and initial metallurgy has returned very good gold recoveries using conventional cyanidation,” continued George Paspalas. “The Hosco West Extension area has identified refractory mineralization that is significantly higher grade than the average grade in the conceptual Hosco pit. The Company intends to spend an additional $4.2 million to continue the drilling in these areas. We remain committed to growing the Company by pursuing opportunities that would be accretive to shareholder value.”

Project Highlights
Assumptions
Gold Price (US$/ounce)1,350
Foreign exchange rate (C$/ US$)1:1
Fuel price ($/litre)0.90
Net Smelter Royalty (%)2.0
Mineral Reserves
Proven and Probable in-pit Reserves (Million ounces)1.66
Mine Parameters
Ore milled
Mine plan tonnage (Million tonnes)41.1
Mine plan grade (grams/tonne)1.26
Strip ratio (waste: ore)4.49:1
Average daily production rate (tonnes)8,500
Estimated gold recovery (%)87.5
Total recovered gold (Million ounces)1.45
Pre-production period, post permitting (years)1.7
Mine life (years)13.4
Average annual gold production (ounces)110,000
Costs
Pre-production capital ($ Million)422.2
Sustaining capital and restoration ($ Million)97.3
Cost per tonne milled ($)25.32
Average operating cash cost (US$/ounce)716
Royalties (US$/ounce)30
Average total cash cost (US$/ounce)746
Financial Analysis
Average annual cash flow pre-tax (years 2 – 13)($ Million)61.7
Payback period (years)8.2
IRR pre-tax (%)8.7
IRR after-tax (%)6.5
NPV 5% discount pre-tax ($ Million)111.6
This review was posted in and related to company . Bookmark the permalink.

Reviews

Good News for Someone

June 6, 2012 at 8:51 am
Zurbo Zurbo

Capital cost basically increased 2.5 times and cash cost is up about 70% compared with the pre-feasibility study released in November 2009. That’s not terribly shocking, and since the economics weren’t ever especially mouth-watering in the first place Aurizon’s decision to postpone a development decision seems the right one. Investors should certainly appreciate the honesty. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out who is most likely to benefit from today’s news, albeit on the conference call there really wasn’t too much noticeable enthusiasm for acquisitions or fast-tracking development of other advanced projects. Understandably there seemed to be plenty of reluctance to prematurely put Joanna on back-burner before exhaustively looking at alternative development strategies dependent on exploration success on Heva, where it sounds like at least 3-6 more months of drilling is needed to better determine if staged production is worth more serious consideration…and if I heard correctly perhaps 2-3 year process to complete updated feasibility study.

a year ago

Leave a Reply

Only Metal Augmentor subscribers can post comments. If you are a subscriber, please login to post a comment.

Not a subscriber? Become one today!

web design by Web Design Jakarta. WordPress code & SEO Optimized by WordPress Expert.