First and Last Word on Metals and Mining

We are at PDAC this week researching mining companies and stories. The Toronto Convention Center is busy as usual with thousands of mining heads taking care of business. Almost 600 exhibitors (not including the “trades” like drillers and consulting firms) are manning the impressively-long isles of booths so there is simply no chance that we can catch up with all the people we’d like … but we’re certainly going to try hard. The list of “top priority” stories that we are following numbers over 60 so we’ve got our work cut out for us. That said, we’re going to try meeting with some companies suggested by Metal Augmentor subscribers as well … we’ve already received a few requests and would like to invite other subscribers to name a name or two (please use the comments section to do so). A list of exhibitors at the “Investor Exchange” can be found here. In addition, if you happen to be at PDAC yourself, we’d be happy to meet in person. Just send us an email with “PDAC Meeting” in the header with your details. We also plan to continue tweeting some of our findings — the plan being to have the most tweets with the #PDAC hash tag — so please consider following us on Twitter as well.

Okay, let’s go on with reporting some of our findings from the first day at PDAC. For the sake of speed, we’re leaving off company symbols and other details in favor of getting the raw reporting done.

Gryphon Gold — Lisanna Lewis, VP-Treasurer, mentioned new pump with proper sizing that can supply 1200gpm to the leach pad as an initial step to turn around the production story at the Borealis project in Nevada. Previously we’d learned that it would be summer before the leach characteristics of the reprocessed tailings (much less the raw ore they plan to eventually mine) could be fully evaluated. As a result we’ve been in a wait-and-see mode with this story. In the meantime, the hope would be that old management took the OPUD with them.

Aurizon Mines — We spoke with Jennifer North, Investor Relations Manager, again to better understand the company’s pipeline. It remains management’s plan to finish evaluating the economic and development parameters of Joanna by mid-year in order to make a go or no-go decision. Pending this decision, Joanna remains the number one project in Aurizon’s development pipeline with the Marban project joint-ventured with NioGold being number two. There is a possibility that Marban could become the top priority if Joanna is not going forward but Aurizon is also looking around for quality gold deposits with near-term production potential. Whatever happens, the year 2012 could be an exciting one for gold in Quebec.

Goldgroup — Caballo Blanco is the low grade oxide gold project in Mexico that Goldgroup plans to develop as its initial mine. The project looks relatively easy … with John Sutherland, VP-CFO, explaining some salient details and providing a project update … and should progress quickly to development after the PEA is completed next month. There are some regional rumblings about open pit mining but that is not unusual for this part of Mexico. And while Caballo Blanco isn’t sexy or massive, neither was Timmins or Argonaut when their respective projects were at a pre-development stage .. and yet those companies are now well-respected and successful cash cows with Mexican open pit, heap leach gold mines.

Avalon Rare Metals — While Avalon will have its development challenges, the investor relations duo of Ron Malashewski and Mandeep Singh Rayat does a good job of emphasizing that (1) the company has tried hard not to understate the cost or complexity of building the mine and processing plant (and therefore may avoid the same nasty negative surprises that are plaguing the rare earth projects as they progress through early development efforts) and (2) a fully feasibility study supported by advanced pilot plant testing should be completed by year-end thereby making the case that Avalon could be one of the nearest-term producers aiming to sell separated rare earth oxides (the “Lynas model” that is also being pursued by the likes of Frontier Rare Earths in South Africa). We haven’t given this angle much consideration but will need to study it closer and will therefore plan to meet with Bill Mercer, VP-Exploration, later in the week to discuss some technical details.

Marathon Gold — We spoke with Phillip Walford, President/CEO, about some of the unique features of the high-grade Leprechaun Gold Deposit at the Valentine Lake Gold project in Newfoundland. They have some really nice gold intercepts in quartz-tourmaline-pyrite veins forming in what appears to be dilational jogs related to shears along a major regional fault structure. And although the focus is near-surface mineralization that can be extracted via open pit, Phillip makes the point that the gold mineralization falls into the “orogenic” classification and thus could have significant upside at depth as well as resource growth potential along strike where the company is likely to focus its efforts for the time being.

Mirasol — Paul Lhotka, Principal Geologist, explained the ways in which Coeur d’Alene Mines has been expressing satisfaction with the progress of exploration at the Joaquin joint venture. By all rights it looks like Coeur could get serious about making Joaquin its newest silver mine … and with a company like Coeur you often see things instantly go from crawl to sprint. At Virginia, Paul points out the early stage of the regional exploration effort and cautions against an analysis of resource potential that relies more on blue sky than brown ground (in other words, they have found some nice zones so far including the central Julia vein but these are discrete ore bodies holding no insight as to the presence of any others nearby). That type of honest and frank attitude is always appreciated.

Corvus Gold — We talked about the North Bullfrog gold deposit with Russell Myers, President, to understand why a deposit at such a low grade (under 0.40 grams per tonne gold) can indeed be economic under the right circumstances. As usual it comes down to where the rocks are and how easily the gold can be coaxed from them with cyanide.

Levon Resources — We met Vic Chevillon, VP-Exploration, at the core shack and looked at some of the diatreme breccias Levon has drilled at the Cordero Project. Vic pointed out that although the resource is already pretty friggin’ big, the company is now stepping out to add resource along the pit edges. This would help convert to ore some of the rock currently modeled as waste and thereby result in a larger resource and perhaps better project economics. Frankly a project like this probably doesn’t make sense at $10 silver but it starts to look pretty darn good at $30 … in the same way that Goldcorp’s Penasquito didn’t make sense at historically-low metal prices but may work in the current environment. That said, Vic has a goal of finding the gold he suspects is located nearby because it is the gold (rather than silver or base metals) the majors seem to be after.

Excellon Resources — The booth caught our attention because they posted a Toronto police officer at the booth … very Village Peoplesque. At first we thought maybe it had something to do with the ongoing union problems but actually the officer was posted to guard some substantial silver dore bars. Since Excellon produces and ships a concentrate to smelters via Trafigura (the commodities trader), there is no telling if this silver actually came from La Platosa. We would have liked to learn about plans being formulated to eventually expand production beyond 200tpd, but due to water inflow it was made pretty clear that at this particular mine the 200tpd was something of an upper limit.

Queenston Mining — Last time we spoke with Queenston in detail (which was PDAC 2011) the company did not have any gold deposits advanced far enough to discuss in detail. Now they do with a PEA for Upper Beaver that looks quite toothy. We went over a few things with Bill McGuinty, VP-Exploration, and then talked strategic possibilities with Charles Page, President/CEO. With Upper Beaver turning out quite robust, a central mill with ore being fed from several district mines may no longer be the best strategic option. Although the idea itself remains valid, it might be made irrelevant if more of the deposits start to look as robust as Upper Beaver.

Esperanza Resources — The open pit heap leach Cerro Jumil project in Mexico continues to progress toward development and should eventually attract a more decent valuation as the Feasibility Study is completed toward the end of this year, or if Paul Bartos, VP-Chief Geologist, can successfully expand the deposit and make another discovery at one of the nearby targets the company plans to drill (once surface rights and permitting are taken care of). It seems a bit more patience is needed here but not that much.

Global Minerals — Pumping water to gain underground access at the Strieborna silver deposit in Slovakia has gone relatively well — Esperanza’s Paul Bartos, VP-Chief Geologist, is keeping close tabs on the progress given that his company owns a nice chunk of Global — and it looks like they should be able to build underground drill stations in a few months to advance the resource definition efforts as well as target some additional areas for expansion. As with mother ship Esperanza, some more patience is needed but the action and news flow should pick up as the year progresses.

SilverCrest Mines — We’ve been trying to gain a better understanding of the large, low grade silver/copper deposit that SilverCrest is exploring at La Joya in Durango, Mexico. Low grade silver deposits can be tricky to mine and process at a profit so it is important to evaluate each one and if possible to find an analogy of a successful operation. In this case there are apparently some analogies to the Sabinas and San Martin mines being operated by Penoles and Grupo Mexico, respectively. Unfortunately we hadn’t gotten very far in evaluating that angle because Eric Fier, COO, who apparently knows quite a bit about those mines, has been a very busy man recently. But no worries as Mr. Fier’s daughter, Rosy, came to the rescue at PDAC and was very clearly able to articulate not only what La Joya was mostly about (stacked lower grade mantos cut by high grade stockwork feeders and underlain by a skarn) but also to provide the analogical context to Sabinas (where mining is underground and exploiting mainly the skarn). As a result of the much-better understanding, we have shifted our thinking on La Joya from simply a “large, low grade silver deposit” to a more complex deposit model with potentially several paths to production. The key would be the wide range of cutoff grades possible as a result of the high grade stockworks constituting a significant portion of the tonnage. In other words, La Joya may not turn out to be a massive mining scenario with several hundred million “silver equivalent” ounces but that’s okay given that 50 million ounces of higher grade open pittable silver with a mean copper credit would still be quite valuable (perhaps more than a huge low grade silver deposit).

Disclaimer: We don’t currently own any of the above companies with the exception of NioGold and we do not receive compensation for our commentaries from any party. This is not investment advice, which you should seek from a licensed investment professional.

About silverax

Tom has been told he is arrogant. Unfortunately only very strong medication will apparently chill him out, but he doesn't like to put things in his body that might dull his sharp mind. Which is like an ax. And no, he is not a Scientologist. He can, however, turn lead into silver by concentrating very hard. See picture for proof.
This entry was posted in Analysis, Discovery Plays, Exploration Plays and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to PDAC 2012 Day 1Comment RSS Feed

  1. 1mh0tep

    Thanks for the report Tom !
    I would be very pleased if you could expose your thoughts after meeting management of South American Silver and/or Apogee Silver !
    The first one has almost 1 bilion Oz AgEq (copper/silver/indium) in Bolivia and Chile with attractive PEA in Bolivia heap leach operation (38% IRR, 700M$ NPV, 400M$ capex) for only 200M$ FD marketcap !
    The second one, also in Bolivia and Chile, has 150M Oz AgEq (70% Ag) with a 65M$ FD marketcap.
    Have a good day 2 ;-)

  2. try Timberline Resources – it should have be “near term – 2012″ producer if some obstacles passed…. I think it is very “hot”…

  3. GMR

    Suggestions for PDAC.
    1)Endeavour Mining.(EDV) Same area as Perseus which is on your watch list.
    2) Minco Silver (MSV)
    3) Royal Nickel(RNX).
    Good 2nd day.

    GM

  4. Bruce

    I would also like to hear something on Timberline.

  5. Mike

    my ‘wishlist’ top 5:
    - Dundee Precious Metals
    - Crocodile Gold
    - Orvana
    - Lydian
    - Trelawney

    and if you happen to see Adrian Fleming, ask him about ‘Valhalla Resources’, a newly listed explorer in Romania/Turkey

  6. Sandstorm President & CEO Nolan Watson is speaking at the PDAC on Wednesday, March 7 at 11:40am EST in Room 801A

    Sandstorm gold is the only one pure “gold” stream play and copying Silver Wheaton model, so it is at least worth to see ;-)

    I’m already invested in, but might some more details will be revealed..

  7. joey

    Re: Marathon Gold (moz.to):

    “They have some really nice gold intercepts in quartz-tourmaline-pyrite veins forming in what appears to be dilational jogs related to shears along a major regional fault structure… Phillip makes the point that the gold mineralization falls into the “orogenic” classification…”

    From Para 1.4.3 Valentine Lake project Technical Report dated 31jan11:

    “Gold occurrences at the Valentine Lake property are classified as structurally controlled
    mesothermal auriferous quartz vein type deposits where gold occurs within extensional or
    shear fracture veins, often associated with pyrite or arsenopyrite.

    The Leprechaun gold resource is primarily associated with quartz-tourmaline veins hosted in sheared granite.”

    Silverax, can I assume that one should be more circumspect about this project because it presents as shear hosted mineralization?

    I am very interested as I have a position in moz.to.

    • @joey

      Most greenstone belt gold deposits are associated with shears and these have yielded hundreds of millions of ounces of profitably-mined gold throughout the world, so by itself we should not assume shear hosted gold mineralization is a negative. Where we must be careful is to not ignore some of the shear characteristics that can develop such as sometimes concentrating gold into variable or discontinuous zones. These zones can appear to have very high grade (multiple ounces) yet amount to only small tonnages. This might be especially true if straining continues to be active post-mineralization since that is probably what helps redistribute the gold from the simple primary fracture-filling geometry of a hydrothermal fluid flow to the complex jumbled-up fabrics of highly-strained mineralogy. Here is where having a narrow vs. wide shear zone can make a difference plus a bunch of other things beyond the scope of this response.

    • Giuseppe

      @silverax

      “Goldgroup — Caballo Blanco is the low grade oxide gold project in Mexico that Goldgroup plans to develop as its initial mine. The project looks relatively easy … with John Sutherland, VP-CFO, explaining some salient details and providing a project update … and should progress quickly to development after the PEA is completed next month”

      - – - –

      Goldgroup was trading at 1.32 c$ then, now it trades at 36.6 cents: -72% with final drop these days because of negative market reaction since the company has had its Change of Soil Use Permit returned to the Company, from the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources, requesting that GGA provide further details. Maybe a buy opportunity?
      I like these 3 small gold producers and they are all being crushed these days/weeks: OMI, IRL and GGA. I do own OMI and GGA, but not IRL because of the Argentine connection.

    • @Giuseppe

      Goldgroup certainly looks closer to the bottom than the top…if you were a buyer at 1.32 then I don’t see why not commit the cardinal sin of averaging down after the 70% drop in 2 months. That said, my suspicion is that Goldgroup really did a crap job of the environmental reports that were submitted and as a result now might be viewed as a bad corporate citizen by the Mexican federal permitting agencies, as if being located in Veracruz isn’t already reason enough to be extra careful about your mining impacts (this is a tourist/enviro region of Mexico that has also seen quite a bit of social and local community activism). In southern, subtropical, indigenous-rights-sensitive Mexico you simply cannot go about your ecological work the same way you might in the dry northern hills and deserts. You need to be more like GORO (Gold Resource Corp.), building beautiful facilities, keeping everything neat and tidy, and promising the locals heaven and earth if they will only tolerate your mining disturbance. I don’t have a sense one way or the other if Goldgroup has the right frame of mind or is simply the typical hell or high water approach that is often used but rarely works. I guess at 36 cents or thereabouts it probably doesn’t matter much…

    • Tweetie

      @Giuseppe

      ” since the company has had its Change of Soil Use Permit returned to the Company, from the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources, requesting that GGA provide further details”

      These are the terms the company uses in its press release.

      If I google (translate) for webpages from Veracruz, the picture is a lot more negative. For instance:
      http://www.veracruzanos.info/gobierno-de-veracruz-seguira-pugnando-contra-la-mina-caballo-blanco-sedema/

      My summary would be:
      * local government is dead set against the project
      * permit was DENIED by the central government
      * company can appeal the decision

      I would value the company as if the project were dead.

    • @Tweetie

      That is excellent, thanks for the comment…it is this type of community and communication that makes what we have here unique! I think that is probably right, politically the project is in major trouble and after reading more about the circumstances I would say that permitting risk going forward is very high (not that it wasn’t significant before). Effectively the market is giving zero value for the project at this point. The real shame in this type of situation is that there was really no straightforward investor access to learn about the community opposition (Otto had written some about it but even he gave decent odds of project approval). This is actually a key area of this market we want to help improve with Metal Augmentor … to wit, ideally the Company pages will have this type of information readily available so that investors can make better and more informed decisions. Of course with so many companies and projects out there it is and will be a tremendous effort but we’ll keep plugging away and hopefully have some help along the way as well. I’d like to think in 5 years MA will be indispensable for every resource investor in the same way it hopefully already is for our subscribers.

  8. Giuseppe

    Maybe you could be so kind to share a word with us about PDAC 2013?

    • @Giuseppe

      Word! ;) But seriously, it’s on our list. As Zurbo mentioned we did tweet some of the worthier observations (some of these were obvious I know but stating the obvious succinctly can still be a very useful thing) and the rest, well, they require some more careful wording to have good utility. Frankly the mode I’ve been in, and I’m not saying it is particularly the best one, is to be collecting and assimilating information in this tough market and be ready to talk when it matters instead of flapping lips to a mostly empty room at a point when it won’t be particularly relevant and quickly/easily forgotten. In so many words, nothing we say at this point is really going to matter in the market. But that said, there is quite a bit of useful information we need to be sharing and documenting regardless of other factors and it is not appropriate to simply waylay everything simply because the market sucks. I’m planning to make amends for these shortcomings in the immediate future.

Leave a Reply

Only Metal Augmentor subscribers can post comments. If you are a subscriber, please login to post a comment.

Not a subscriber? Become one today!

web design by Web Design Jakarta. WordPress code & SEO Optimized by WordPress Expert.